• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    ELI5: Why use /e/OS over Graphene? This isn’t a rhetorical rant; I’m genuinely curious.


    Edit: See below. I misphrased this question.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sorry, I realize that question could be interpreted in two ways: I meant for Fairphone not to try to get Graphene working on their phone. I know Motorola is trying to do that right now, for example.

        • Baaron87@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 month ago

          From what I’ve read elsewhere (seen some comments here, don’t remember the exact threads) the Graphene team has a specific hardware requirement that Fairphone doesn’t supply. Would be cool to see both projects working together though

            • Baaron87@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              That would be awesome if they do so. I like /e/OS for what it is and does, my FP4 works great after all. That said, having the option for Graphene OS I feel would do nothing but benefit all parties, so hopefully that can be addressed at some point.

        • perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The team behind GrapheneOS want it to be really secure so they have specific requirements that the phones from Fairphone sadly doesn’t meet.

          For a phone to meet all of these requirements AND still being everything that a Fairphone is would make the phone more expensive than the average consumer would be willing to pay. I know several enthusiasts (me included) that would pay for one, but there are simply just to few of us.

    • accideath@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s mostly a thing of what’s available for your phone. For pixels 6 and newer (and I think some new motorolas as of recently) you can use graphene. If you are on fairphone or a bunch of other devices, you have support for e/OS. In general, graphene is a bit more secure than e/OS, so if you have the choice, it’s probably the way to go but if you don’t have a pixel and don’t want to buy one, e/OS is probably one of the better maintained degoogled android versions out there.
      Here you can find a list with a feature comparison.

  • CountVlad47@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been using /e/OS on a FP6 for a few months now and I’m very happy with it (edit: for context I’m in Europe). I had doubts about whether it could run certain apps like bank or government apps but they work just fine. Most of the default apps work well, but I did replace the launcher because the one that comes with /e/OS doesn’t have as many features as I would like.

    Battery life is also better than previous phones I’ve used. I don’t know if that’s because of the hardware or because the OS is less resource hungry.

    One thing to watch out for is it doesn’t have a headphone jack, though you can get a separate adapter that plugs into the charging port.