there are only two kinds of political positions: common sense (i.e. agrees with me), and mental illness.
I would like to hear the rationale for putting Buddhist theocracy to the right of Christian theocracy. Not saying it’s wrong; I don’t know enough about Buddhism to have a stance. But I’m familiar with Christianity and it’s hard to imagine anything out-fasching it.
“buddhism” is just a term to describe any worldview that comes from south-east asia. there’s more variety within buddhism than within christianity, and there you can find a whole lot of disagreements and different ways of life already.
Idk more kinds of Christians maybe? The spectrum is real broad 50k plus completely different sects. Ones like the UCC (United Church of Christ) come to mind as being alright. Still wouldn’t want any religion based government system though.
But .ml told me that all forms of liberalism are actually fascism so most of the bottom half should be in authright.
You may not like it but that’s how peak democracy looks like
My xyphoid process is too thin.
