

Tooms? Who ate liver to survive?


Tooms? Who ate liver to survive?


Why wouldn’t people have the same rights? I am pretty sure if someone keeps blocking me I could call the cops and they would show up (after some time).
Question is rather why a robot would have the same rights. Or rather why a company has these rights for their robot.


Not because it’s morally reprehensible but because there was backlash.
TBF, the backlash comes because it’s morally reprehensible. So by extension…
But yeah, Trump himself doesn’t have any moral or ethics.


I am also surprised by that wording. I assume Zelenskyy sinply employs the same “technique” as Trump: just matter-of-factly state something to fit the narrative for your goals and blame everyone else for being incompetent dumbfucks or liars.
In the end it’s all a bit “he said she said” anyway.
Edit: hey hey, why the downvotes? Please elaborate. Last headline I read was that Zelenskyy didn’t know about any “deal”. Trump talked to Putin and then announced a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia.
Now Zelenskyy says Russia broke the cease fire. That sounds to me more like just spinning Trumps onesided narrative further to have a public reason for continuing hurting Russia (which is fine by me).
I was just trying to point out that the narrative is surprising/weird.


Problem is that they still endanger you. Being right while being seriously injured or dead doesn’t help you a lot.
Had a teacher go through the tests, held up one of a class mate and announced “this is the worst I’ve ever seen”. A few pages later she holds up mine with “oh, this is even worse”. 😒


I guess it doesn’t simply turn into some kind of potatoe soup?
The Blair Witch Project gave me quite a lot of fear of dark forests, or lost places for that matter.