You are just making the scenario fit the word when it doesn’t. I thought I took a middle of the road stance where l could see what people thought about the various conspiracies around 9/11. You’re fake quoting me on things I never said. Where was the “challenge”? I made no posits and I was only annoyed at the instant downvotes when I felt it was a good post. Again, hostile place, and yall can suck it
“Sealioning is an online trolling tactic where someone pesters another person with endless, bad-faith requests for evidence and proof while pretending to be polite and reasonable.” I’m not “sealioning”. I never pestered someone for evidence I asked people’s opnions on some common conspiracy points. I’ve no need to be “polite” anymore if youre going to lie about me. You and your ilk are just pricks.
Why be snarky? Id love to look at your linked article, and will look when I get off work Edit:spelling
https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19930227/1687698/twin-towers-engineered-to-withstand-jet-collision “analysis that showed the towers would withstand the impact of a Boeing 707” I think the argument is that the 747s are much larger than 707s and they didnt account for the effect of the jet fuel.
Huh. A genuine ask lemmy question to see what people think and post is already downvoted 4x more than upvoted. Whatever, no point spending time in a hostile ass space.
You cant post anything that slightly resembles 9/11 conspiracy on this site without a slew of downvotes. I made a post just asking if people believed the official story and got verbatim some of the same comments and a slew of downvotes. Presuming they’re not with other malicious motives, I think they’re just close minded dicks