• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Focus on boosting comments instead of sheer volume of posts—people post specifically because they want answers, and seeing a long stream of posts with no responses makes them think it’s not worth bothering.

    I think people’s familiarity with the r/askhistorians subreddit may be discouraging anyone without graduate-level academic experience from responding, but the subreddit didn’t start out requiring that level of rigor—it became more selective as the volume of replies increased. But for here, even a general-knowledge reply can encourage clarifying comments from more-informed people who may otherwise doubt their qualifications.

  • meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Answers would help. Posting random questions hoping others will answer isn’t what makes an Ask[X] community.

  • GatesMcBalmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just a guess, but maybe that you post a seemingly endless stream of mostly insincere and/or easily searched questions while rarely engaging with the people who answer you isn’t leading to interest in your other projects.

  • Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s nothing you can do.

    I single-handedly carried the Jazz community for a year until I said fuck you people and I gave up.

    I just think it is the nature of social media, only 1 out of 300 people want to contribute and put in effort for others to enjoy, the rest just want to drink from the content fire hose and be spoon-fed. And that’s me being generous.